| |
| 2008 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 | EE | Masahito Kitamura, Takehiro Inohara: A characterization of completeness of blockability relations with respect to unanimity. Applied Mathematics and Computation 197(2): 715-718 (2008) |
| 12 | EE | Takehiro Inohara: Relational Nash equilibrium and interrelationships among relational and rational equilibrium concepts. Applied Mathematics and Computation 199(2): 704-715 (2008) |
| 2007 | ||
| 11 | EE | Shojiro Yasui, Takehiro Inohara: A graph model of unanimous decision systems. SMC 2007: 1752-1757 |
| 10 | EE | Sean Walker, Keith W. Hipel, Takehiro Inohara: Strategic analysis of the Kyoto Protocol. SMC 2007: 1806-1811 |
| 9 | EE | Keitarou Ishikawa, Takehiro Inohara: A method to compare influence of coalitions on group decision other than desirability relation. Applied Mathematics and Computation 188(1): 838-849 (2007) |
| 8 | EE | Takehiro Inohara: Self-consistency of decision rules for group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 180(3): 1260-1271 (2007) |
| 7 | EE | Takehiro Inohara: Relational dominant strategy equilibrium as a generalization of dominant strategy equilibrium in terms of a social psychological aspect of decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 182(2): 856-866 (2007) |
| 2004 | ||
| 6 | EE | Takehiro Inohara: Quasi-clusterability of signed graphs with negative self evaluation. Applied Mathematics and Computation 158(1): 201-215 (2004) |
| 5 | EE | Takehiro Inohara: Signed graphs with negative self evaluation and clusterability of graphs. Applied Mathematics and Computation 158(2): 477-487 (2004) |
| 2000 | ||
| 4 | EE | Akira Yamazaki, Takehiro Inohara, Bunpei Nakano: New interpretation of the core of simple games in terms of voters' permission. Applied Mathematics and Computation 108(2-3): 115-127 (2000) |
| 3 | EE | Takehiro Inohara: On consistent coalitions in group decision making with flexible decision makers. Applied Mathematics and Computation 109(2-3): 101-119 (2000) |
| 2 | EE | Takehiro Inohara: Meetings in deadlock and decision makers with interperception. Applied Mathematics and Computation 109(2-3): 121-133 (2000) |
| 1999 | ||
| 1 | EE | Takehiro Inohara: On conditions for a meeting not to reach a recurrent argument. Applied Mathematics and Computation 101(2-3): 281-298 (1999) |
| 1 | Keith W. Hipel | [10] |
| 2 | Keitarou Ishikawa | [9] |
| 3 | Masahito Kitamura | [13] |
| 4 | Bunpei Nakano | [4] |
| 5 | Sean Walker | [10] |
| 6 | Akira Yamazaki | [4] |
| 7 | Shojiro Yasui | [11] |